As Financial Services Splinters, Banks and Fintech Require Standards More Than Ever

As Financial Services Splinters, Banks and Fintech Require Standards More Than Ever

 

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

The splintering of financial services is no longer something that might happen or will happen – this has happened, and seems to be fairly well accepted.  “There’s an app for that” can be said for almost every major (profitable) sliver of the financial services portfolio of business.

I won’t inundate you with examples, but I do love a good infographic and here are a few that illustrate this reality:

Selected-FinTech-Companies.jpg

The unbundling of the bank

A periodic table of Fintech

My point is that a) this is happening in a big way and b) both banks and financial service providers are coexisting and will need to coexist for the time being and into the foreseeable future.

There has always been a need for standards in financial services – banks spend significant funds on integration.  One of the motives behind the BIAN (Banking Industry Architecture Network) {Full disclosure, I am a member and supporter of the BIAN} has been to create open standards that banks and software vendors can align to.  This goal if achieved would help to create increased interoperability between banking software and between banks.

Since this group began the challenge has only increased and now there are more players and the line between what is software and what is banking is blurring.  We now see challenges between Fintech providers – or between major tech players and fintech.

Yes developing standards sounds very boring – but I’m sure there is a non-boring way to define the fabric that will allow for innovation rather than repetition.  How many times will we need to invent the payment header?  Let’s agree on the fundamentals and invent the interesting stuff.

The direction of financial services for both traditional banks and fintech players seems to be heading into the direction of API led integration, but we are going to have (even more of) a real mess on our hands in a few years if the payload and semantic layer is not defined and agreed to.

What’s Next in Digital Finance?

We’ve been doing digital banking for a while now, right?  For over twenty years online banking has existed as a service, so what’s the big deal and why is this now “a thing”?  Well recent years have seen an explosion of new offerings and angles such that the term digital banking is no longer suitableContinue Reading

Why You Need To “Blow Up” Your Legacy BI Platform and How to Start Again With a Sustainable Layered Approach

              Data is important and the key to deriving information which can drive meaningful decisions.  Yet most organizations have a data stack that is sprawling, brittle, unwieldy, and when it comes to driving information for key decisions often not useful. Organizations that are dealing with such legacy systems mightContinue Reading

That’s a great idea! Let’s kill it..

Companies seem to have automatic “immune systems” which are designed to protect the status quo and as a result reject new innovation — especially breakthrough innovation. Innovation is a tricky area to navigate for most organizations: naysayers abound when it comes to changes, the element of risk makes people shy away from accepting innovative ideas,Continue Reading

Navigating the Myriad of Mobile Financial Services

If you are a financial services organization and you build a mobile app then you’re done, right? You can check off the mobile category and get back to the joys of responding to regulatory requirements. But then something changes or- a question is asked about something that might be related -, “What about our internalContinue Reading

Skip to toolbar